Here is every scenario, with the model answer next to your own. Tap any one to open it.
A pelvic positioning belt is not a seatbelt. It is a force you use to control the pelvis. In this case, its role is to stop the pelvis rolling back into a posterior pelvic tilt. For it to do its job, the angle and tension on the belt need to be correct.
You want it in front of the bony bump on the side of the femur, the greater trochanter and done up firm. From there the belt holds the pelvis down and back.
Think of the pelvis as a ball that wants to roll backwards. When it rolls back, the hips slide forward and the person slumps. It rolls around the greater trochanter. That bony bump is the pivot point of the hips. Sit the belt just in front of it and it blocks that bump from sliding forward as the pelvis tries to roll. Block it there and the pelvis stays put.
At 45 degrees you are not only behind the pivot point, you are pushing on the hip bones (the ASIS) and driving the pelvis into a posterior tilt. It is also uncomfortable and it limits their ability to lean forward or pressure relieve. That angle is ideal for the opposite problem, an anterior pelvic tilt, where you are trying to hold the hips back.
45 degrees: wrong for posterior tilt. It is ideal for anterior tilt.
60 to 70 degrees: good. It blocks the trochanters.
Close to 90 degrees: even better. It also cuts shear and lets the client lean forward to take pressure off their sitting bones.
Both correct belts here are two-point belts, mounted well. That is usually all you need. The little non-padded strap is only an anchor. It stops the padded belt drifting. In this case it stops the belt sliding forward as the person goes into a posterior tilt. It does not position the pelvis on its own. If your two-point is in the right spot, you often do not need the four-point at all. The four-points in these photos are all mounted incorrectly. Think of it this way. If you cut the non-padded strap off, how would it hurt the belt? It wouldn't.
Snug. A rough rule: you can slide your fingers under the belt with a bit of effort, but not your whole hand. Loose and it is just a safety strap, not a positioning tool.
This is not just my opinion. The positioning belt standards, ISO/TS 16840-15 and BS 8625, both require the belt to sit anterior to the greater trochanters. So this holds up against the people who write the standards, not just clinical habit.
Before anything else, the transfer. Get the hips fully back into the chair. Fix the transfer and you are about 60% of the way there. Everything else is about holding the person in that spot.
When we see a gap under someone's thighs at the front of the cushion, the instinct is to go longer. That is often the opposite of what you want. Too long and they will never sit upright.
Before you decide to correct a posture, you have to know whether it will let you. That is what reducible and non-reducible means and it changes the whole plan.
You can bring the segment all the way back to neutral. If it reaches neutral, you correct it and hold it there.
It will not come all the way back to neutral. Something else has to give before it gets there. Anything short of neutral is non-reducible, so you accommodate it. You build the seating around the shape they have. You do not force it straight.
Gently guide the segment toward neutral and watch the rest of the body. If it reaches neutral cleanly, it is reducible. If it stops short, or something else shifts to let it happen, it is non-reducible.
It is per body part, not per person. Reducible and non-reducible describe a segment, not the whole person. Someone can be reducible at the pelvis and non-reducible through the trunk. Assess each area on its own.
Why not "fixed"? Fixed sounds permanent and final. Non-reducible is more accurate. It can still progress if you leave it unsupported.
The sliding scale. Reducible means it comes all the way back to neutral. Anything less is non-reducible. The scale is how far short of neutral it sits, not a midpoint between the two.
Expect them to lean toward the high side. With a high right hip, they lean right. As the right side of the pelvis sits higher, the spine curves to compensate and the high-side shoulder drops, so the trunk collapses toward the high side.
Same method, you just accommodate instead of correct. Build up the high side to evenly distribute pressure and give the body stability, rather than forcing the pelvis level.
You have it right when the whole underside of the thigh is loaded evenly. Spreading the weight along the whole thigh keeps it off the sitting bones, so the skin is protected. It also gives the pelvis a stable base, so they are not sliding forward to find support.
The feet are either dangling or not properly supported. They might be touching the footplate but not enough to stop the slide, so the client slides forward to make contact. That allows them to slide back into a posterior pelvic tilt.
The distal part of the femur, the area close to the knee, lifts off the cushion. You can often slide your hand under the distal femur, which means you are not loading evenly. The weight that should be spread along the thigh dumps onto the sitting bones, the ischial tuberosities. That is a pressure injury risk.
Make sure the person is as upright as possible first. Trying to set the footplates before you have secured the pelvis means you are setting them at the wrong height. Hips first, then legs.
The cushion is one piece of the system, not the whole answer. Work through these.
The catch: "the cushion must be faulty, get a new one." The cushion is one piece of the system, not the whole answer.
Do not just say "pressure relief." Walk them through what recline actually buys, so the extra cost is a decision, not a guess.
A thick back causes three problems the moment you add recline. It pushes the person's hip pivot away from the backrest's recline hinge. That gap drives shear on the way down, so your contours and laterals do not stay where you set them. And that same gap leaves a shelf at full recline that arches the person into hyperlordosis.
The person's hips pivot around one point. The backrest reclines around another. A slim back keeps those two close together. A thick back pushes the person's pivot point forward and away from the chair's back pivot point, so the gap between the two pivots grows. The bigger that gap, the more shear you get when you recline.
As you recline, the backrest travels more than the body does. That difference is shear. Shear is hard on the skin and a driver of pressure injuries. It also drags your set-up out of place. The contours and laterals you carefully positioned move up in relation to the person, so they no longer sit where you put them. Anti-shear plates help, but the thicker the back, the bigger the mismatch and the weaker the anti-shear becomes.
At full recline the thick back sits higher than the cushion, so the person is not lying back on something flat. The pelvis sits low and the back has to arch up and over the thick back, which drives the lower back into hyperlordosis.
If you do need a back, choose one with a genuinely good anti-shear mechanism. Set the back and the laterals up while the person is in the typical recline you'd expect them to be in. That's what prevents laterals from riding into someone's axilla when they go into recline once you've gone.
The catch: "a thicker, plusher back must be more comfortable." It feels like the caring choice, but with recline it drives shear and hyperlordosis. Slim wins.
A joystick power-assist meets the stated goal, a portable chair the person can drive. It does not meet the clinical need. Your job is to show the daughter what it gives up, not to win the argument.
Prescribe for what the person needs most of the time. A portable chair that fails 90% of the day is not a win. Meet the 90% with the power wheelchair. Then if portability truly matters, a lower-cost second chair can cover the 10%. It keeps the person safe, functional, comfortable and independent for the rest of their week.
The point: most users want a joystick power-assist because it seems like the best of both worlds. It is your job to show them what they are giving up and the realities of transporting a power-assist. Give clients informed choice, then decide together what is best.
The funder is not buying a better chair. They are funding a documented need. Every premium feature on your script has to trace back to something in your assessment. Standard is the baseline. Your job is to show why this client needs above-standard.
Did you name a feature that is not on this list? It may still be correct. As long as it does something a lower-cost chair cannot, it counts.
Book a free Strategy Session. We will go through your actual cases and show you exactly where to sharpen.
Get help to fix this →